Hello folks 👋 I'm facing an strange behaviour in SpiceDB. I've SpiceDB 1.31.0 running,a nd when querying a lookupSubjects with a limit: 1. the limit is ignored 2. it never returns a cursor that I can use to paginate. In my case, spicedb contains 10 records that would match the query, and when I pass a limit 5, it returns all 10 of them without a cursor instead of returning 5 and a cursor to keep going. Is it expected behaviour? I'm not seeing that with lookupResources for example Thx so much! (Investigating more, it seems that zed cli doesn't document --page-limit for lookup-subjects, but it does for lookup-resources; on top of that, on the protobuf docs, both seem to accept the optional_concrete_limit param https://buf.build/authzed/api/docs/main:authzed.api.v1#authzed.api.v1.LookupSubjectsRequest)

checking on this, we may also extend the deprecation to permissions and subjects, I have put my thoughts in the comments of the PR, you guys can take a look whenever you are free.

For anyone using typescript & spicedb, we just published an open source library that parses & semantically analyzes the .zed file format. The niche it fills for us is allowing us to codegen a type-safe SDK for our SchoolAI app, based directly upon our current schema.zed file. The suggested typescript SDK code generator is completely optional, but shows a path if you want to do something similar. https://www.npmjs.com/package/@schoolai/spicedb-zed-schema-parser

I want to update schema in spice but it want to delete old relationships also, I any best practice avaiable for do so in genric way.

Greetings all! Would any of you nice folks here be able to point me to or share some cool grafana dashboards and possibly some alerts manager-like alerts for spicedb?

Hi everyone, I wanted understand which schema is more performant for lookUpResource,lookUpSubjects and permissionCheck queries. scheam 1: definition user {} definition platform { relation administrator: user permission super_admin = administrator } definition organization { relation org_administrator: platform | user permission org_admin = org_administrator + org_administrator->super_admin } definition partner { relation admin: user | organization relation manager: user relation staff: user permission view_ledger = admin + admin->org_admin + manager + staff permission edit_ledger = admin + admin->org_admin + manager } schema 2: definition user {} definition platform { relation administrator: user } definition organization { relation platform_admins: platform#administrator | user relation org_members : user } definition partner { relation admin: organisaton#platform_admins | user relation manager: user relation staff: user relation viewer : organization#org_member | user permission view_ledger = admin + manager + staff + viewer permission edit_ledger = admin + manager }

Heya. @yetitwo and myself will be on livestream later today (July 3) to talk about observability, spicedb and datadog. Link is in the Events tab on Discord ↖️

I think the go website will only update if you release v0.30.3 (or newer) for zed package

we're live!

How do I get

zed validate

to give me a line number?

it does for a zed file, but not for a .yaml file

are you talking about validation errors/warnings for the schema, or are you talking about assertions in the validation file?

hello. We have copied our postgress db to new one and used it for spice db. After it we receive "unexpected consistency middleware error" errors, how can i fix it? i tried to restart spicedb app, tried to update schema, but it didnt help(

Hi! I was looking for a UI to manage SpiceDB — something that could help visualize the schema, manage entities and permissions more easily. Since I couldn’t find a full-featured one, I went ahead and built a basic UI using the SpiceDB APIs. It’s still early-stage and minimal, but functional. 🔗 https://github.com/mejaz/spicedb-ui

There was a formatting error (used

:

instead of

=

in a relations) , but not line nr on the error, which is fun on a long file

ahhh yeah that's not ideal. we're dropping that context somewhere. i'll add an issue to the repo.

clarification: is this with the

schema:

key or with the

schemaFile:

key?

I'll add the example tomorrow when I am back at work

thank you!

Hello All , I am tring to WATCH spicedb using java authz api version 1.3 , using streaming .. when I connect to local spicedb works which is over http but when I connect to devbox exposed over ssl its not getting data , I check server cert and imported to application but still its failing , i can see TLS1.3 is used and hanshake is success

Hello Guys. I have a slight problem in production where my pods are restarting due to a` invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference` 🧵

Hey folks. A rather broad question: Is there any effort ongoing to help openID authZEN or to support the implementers draft? Context: I've just checked out and found it very fitting, esp. with the bulk calls they add in draft 1.1

nvm, just found https://discord.com/channels/844600078504951838/900405749405089812/1359904145422815323 - let's put it that way: I understand the "little traction" argument, but i'd love an open standard and customers should, too 😉

Hi, I am on a very old version of spicedb (1.13) + mysql8. I'm trying to figure out what i need to do to upgade, but it seems like the only way is checking all the github releases? Basically I want to know if I can just upgrade to the latest and migrate, or are there any major "stepping stones" I need to upgrade to first?

are you using any of the experimental APIs or the old V0 API?

github.com/authzed/authzed-go/proto/authzed/api/v0

is the v0 api? we aren't using it

and no experimental apis

then it should be safe, minus some flags that we've removed. I'd recommend backing up your datastore entirely, then trying the migration on a copy

if that works without issues, then upgrade the real install