you're not he first person to mention this

We're considering adding a checkbox that will clear out the permission system when you reload a schema. We recommend just creating a new permission system for now as you iterate.

👍 no worries. let me know if you want me to create an issue. As for now, I'm not really bothered by it (just noticing) and my "development" playground will get messy anyways as I progress.

We don't have a way to delete old definitions right now, but I don't think it'd take very long for us to add functionality to clear out the relationships.

as you iterate, let me know which is worse ^^

hi!

hey there

do you have an elixir client in the roadmap?

and is authzed ready for a production app?

you're actually the first person to request an elixir client

Haha 🥳

i haven't looked into the protobuf ecosystem in elixir, so I'm not sure how ready that is

we support clojure by ways of java, maybe we could do elixir by ways of erlang?

i'll have to look into erlang and elixir protobuf libraries to see if either are mature

there are a few libs but I havent used them so not sure how mature

authzed is ready for prod apps, but we do force users to basically schedule a call with us before we enable production mode on their accounts

it's more or less just to make sure we're all on the same page -- and we typically share a slack channel with the company so that we can have a dialog wrt performance and feature requests

scheduled call is fine 🙂

and slack channel sounds good!

if you were to implement an elixir client, roughly when would that be fitting into the schedule? (sorry, I know a tough question!)

yeah, it really depends on how mature the library ecosystem is, it only took a few days for us to get a ruby client generated and provide feature parity with other languages

honestly most of the time is around us writing examples and making sure everything is sane -- just generating the protobufs is typically quick if the protobuf support is good in the language

it's asking a lot of our users, but you could even try generating them yourself as nothing is private

it looks like https://github.com/elixir-protobuf/protobuf should be stable enough to use

how bad is calling erlang from elixir?

if we only supported erlang would that be enough for both?

or do you think most elixir devs would hate that?

Calling erlang is not too bad, but elixir devs would mostly have a pref for elixir

it depends mostly how complex the api is I think

yeah that makes sense