As in OWL it would be nice to define a relation as being the inverse of another relation. For instance, *hasParent *is the inverse relation of hasChild. That would ease defining permissions or adding resources.
WDYT?
like as opposed to defining a relation pointing one way on one definition and then a corresponding relation pointing the other way on the other definition?
yetitwo
09/02/2024, 6:46 PM
one thing to keep in mind is that you typically think about constructing a permission as a walk from a resource to a subject, and in my experience there aren't actually a ton of use cases that require having relations pointing both ways between two resources
z
zerzio69
09/03/2024, 11:47 AM
You're probably right. I thought it would simplify a bit the management of the resource instances and relations but it may not be useful for permission inferences