hey! apologies - more modeling questions around at...
# spicedbd
derwolfe
04/28/2022, 4:10 PMhey! apologies - more modeling questions around attributes. https://play.authzed.com/s/pqFVWEjV-16N/relationships
derwolfe
04/28/2022, 4:11 PMthis is meant to be a small example of a larger pattern I'm having challenges expressing with attributes/having
derwolfe
04/28/2022, 4:12 PMlooking at those relations; I'm trying to spell that e2erefapp with detail foo should only be able to access
someresourcedemofooanotherderwolfe
04/28/2022, 4:13 PMI've definitely modeled this wrong; as this is essentially taking the union of all details and allowing them to either resource
derwolfe
04/28/2022, 4:15 PMto state the goal slightly differently - I'm trying to attenuate access to a given resource by the attributes of the caller's identity
j
Jake
04/28/2022, 4:16 PMhave you seen the caveated relationships proposal?
Jake
04/28/2022, 4:16 PMJake
04/28/2022, 4:16 PMseems like a really good fit for what you're trying to do
d
derwolfe
04/28/2022, 4:18 PMit does feel close
derwolfe
04/28/2022, 4:19 PMthough it seems slightly different in that the caveats are on the specific relation itself
derwolfe
04/28/2022, 4:20 PMrather than on an aggregate of the relations (apologies if that sounds like non-sense)
j
Jake
04/28/2022, 4:20 PMif you're trying to figure out why something is resolving in a way you're not happy with, you can always add the intermediate steps as Expected Relations and run re-generate:
https://play.authzed.com/s/SCQzeOFUnEL5/expected
d
derwolfe
04/28/2022, 4:20 PMoh neat, I'd not done that. thank you
j
Jake
04/28/2022, 4:21 PMin this case, wouldn't you just write:
deployment/resource:another#app@deployment/app:demo[appDetail=="foo"]d
derwolfe
04/28/2022, 4:21 PMoh wow, if that is possible
j
Jake
04/28/2022, 4:22 PMit would be with caveats
d
derwolfe
04/28/2022, 4:22 PMthen that would be a significant simplification
derwolfe
04/28/2022, 4:22 PMespecially if those caveats could be combines
derwolfe
04/28/2022, 4:22 PMthat would be exactly what I need
j
Jake
04/28/2022, 4:22 PMyeah, check out the proposal, and leave any relevant comments/requirements about your use case
Jake
04/28/2022, 4:22 PMwe would like to get started on it after we sort out a few things for authzed.com
d
derwolfe
04/28/2022, 4:30 PMthis has been our primary modeling barrier so it would be extremely useful to us; if you'd like use-cases etc I'm happy to chat about them as well
derwolfe
04/28/2022, 9:02 PMI in no way mean to pester you on this either but given its important to my spike I've got to ask 😄 do have an approximate timeline for when you expect to start/finish implementing the proposal?